The post also highlights how the rule of absolute liability evolved. Pdf vicarious liability or liability for the acts of. Examples of common law strict liability offences can be seen in cases such as whitehouse v. Furthermore, note that what is known as causation in tort law can be. What is the major difference between a strict liability. The purpose of this chapter is to compare negligence rules and strict liability rules and to examine the allocative effects resulting from the application of different liability regimes. The other four are acting knowingly, acting purposely, acting with recklessness, and acting with negligence. Lecture notes, law of tort law of tort 6fflk001 kcl. It evolved the rule of absolute liability as a part of indian law.
These notes include an overview of what offences are strict liability is and when the court will not presume mens rea. Law times journal is indias leading online portal dedicated to the law which inculcates the ideology of free education in the indian legal sector. Absolute duty means a duty which renders a man liable without any fault of his, irrespective of absence of any intention or negligence. For a very long time, however, there was such a rule, and it. The doctrine of strict liability is commonly applied to cases involving defective products.
Most strict liability offences are found in statutes. The cases of b a minor v dpp 2000 and r v k 2001 have reinforced the common law that in interpreting statutory offences there. Pdf summary notes on strict liability tort onyekachi. This chapter provides an outline of the elements which determine criminal liability, and of the rules relating to proof of those elements. The law imputes strict liability to situations it considers to be inherently dangerous. Distinguishing the concept of strict liability in tort from strict.
Law of delict pvl 3703 second semester 2011 page 2 study unit 2 introduction. Liability for an offence requires that the defendants outward conduct satisfies the requirements of that offence ie the actus reus components and that the defendants has the requisite legally blameworthy state of mind ie the mens rea components. We also stock outlines on criminal law as well as law outlines generally. If defendant does not take precaution and accident happens, defendant is liable b. In cases of strict liability, whether a person or company negligently or intentionally caused harm to person or property does not matter.
The post looks into the essential and exceptions to the rule of strict liability. A brief overview of the main topics of the economic analysis of tort law is given. Grady, supra note 2, at 900 noting that judges do not take into account the cost to. The classic example is that of employer and employee. Criminal law and procedure 09 strict and absolute liability page 4 of 32 a is convicted at trial.
If defendant could take precaution against harm for less. This principle clearly states that a person who keeps. Minipresentations group 1 torts tort is conduct that harms other people or their property. We use your linkedin profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. Marketdriven restraintsincentives reputational iii. It represents not a tort, but a rule of responsibility which renders the. It evolved the rule of absolute liability as a part of indian law in preference to the rule of strict liability laid down in ryland v. In criminal law, strict liability is generally limited to minor offenses.
Strict liability is the principle which evolved from case of rylands v. Malfeasance it is a wrongful act which the actor has no. This article is intended to serve as a brief introduction to product liability law, especially as it relates to food. Though the defendant did not intend any harm by his actions and was completely unaware that he was committing an illegal act, the doctrine of strict liability holds him liable. The strict liability principle is an extremely important concept under the law of torts. Absolute legal responsibility for an injury that can be imposed on the wrongdoer without proof of carelessness or fault. Pdf the purpose of this chapter is to compare negligence rules and strict liability rules. Thus, by intimidating the mentalities of the general populace according to rational processes and common knowledge, criminal law sought to prevent the committal of crime. A basic introduction and summary of strict liability offences.
Strict liability the principle of strict liability. See, for example, the case of harrow london bc v shah 2000. If defendant could take precaution against harm for less than cost probability, he is negligent if he does not and held liable if the event happens. It is a private wrong against a person for which the injured. Strict liability, sometimes called absolute liability, is the legal responsibility for damage, or injury, even if the person found strictly liable was not at fault or negligent the injured party is not required to prove fault liability is strict.
And the various case laws and views of judges of supreme court of india on the old principle. It can be proved only by showing that the act has been committed and there is no need to prove mens rea or intent. Strict liability legal definition of strict liability. Antonio bernardo and eric talley, a note on presumptions with. The portal believes in providing education free of cost by providing a platform wherein young legal, jrf, ias and judiciary aspirants are. Such a claim relies, not on wrongdoing, but on the inherent hazards of the situation or. Nov 04, 2018 strict liability is very important topic of law of tort. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that holds a party responsible for their actions or products, without the plaintiff having to prove negligence or fault. In tort law, strict liability is the imposition of liability on a party without a finding of fault such as negligence or tortious intent. An example of strict liability is injury caused by wild animals in the. The strict liability in fault and the fault in strict liability. His conviction was upheld by the court of appeal which stated that this offence was one of strict liability. What is a crime purpose sought to be achieved by imposing criminal liability on persons or corporations ch1, p11 read on own. Riminal law exam notes uni textbooks, tutors, notes.
In criminal and civil law, strict liability is a standard of liability under which a person is legally responsible for the consequences flowing from an activity even in the absence of fault or criminal intent on the. Strict liability is very important topic of law of tort. He has taught torts, intellectual property, sales, entertainment law, media law, sports law, employment law, and writing. Any enterprise carrying on hazardous activities for private profits have the social responsibility to compensate those suffering from any accident and it should absorb such loss as an item of overhead expenses. Negligence, strict liability, fault, development of tort law 1. Strict liability theoretically limits litigation costs by removing the fault issue from the case more money to the hands of victims faster iii hammontree v. Offences of strict liability require proof that the defendant performed the prohibited conduct, but do not require proof that the defendant was blameworthy. Subject law of torts 5 hurt whoever causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any person is said to cause hurt. She notes a common legal framework, crossing common and civil law boundaries, and focuses on three key questions in determining the scope of this form of strict liability. His conviction was upheld by the court of appeal which stated that this offence. In modern law of torts, absolute liability or means liability without fault i. Deterrance, retribution or incapacitation and rehabilitation.
However, before we embark on our introductory tour of this subject, a few words of warning are necessary. That is, even if both the rules stand for giving punishments for the wrong done by the defendant by dealing with hazardous substance without proper. In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea latin for guilty mind does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus latin for guilty act although intention, recklessness or knowledge may be required in relation to other elements of the offense. In criminal law, strict liability is liability for which mens rea latin for guilty mind does not have to be proven in relation to one or more elements comprising the actus reus latin for guilty act although. If parliament has not included a mens rea requirement for a statutory offence the court has to decide whether to interpret the crime as one of strict liability or to read in a mens rea requirement. The rule of absolute liability is similar to the rule of. People who collect potentially dangerous things on their land are liable for any. Strict liability, sometimes called absolute liability, is the legal. Pdf strict liability versus negligence researchgate. Rules of strict and absolute liability law times journal. Mar, 2016 strict liability is a legal term referring to the holding of an individual or entity liable for damages or losses, without having to prove carelessness or mistake.
Introduction to strict liability notes digestible notes. Sep, 2017 strict liability cases in tort and criminal law strict liability or liability without fault does not require someone to prove that there was an intent behind the act. Sometimes the law imposes a duty where there is no right, this is not tort law must coexist for jurisdiction inside tort law right not to be hit. This contrasts with the common law approach of restitution, which targeted the bodies of. Subject law of torts 1 law of torts including motor vehicle accident and consumer protection laws 2 india uniti evolution of law of torts 1 england. The accused appeals to the high court on two primary issues. It represents not a tort, but a rule of responsibility which renders the defendant liable for the torts committed by another.
If parliament has not included a mens rea requirement for a statutory offence the court has to decide whether to interpret the crime as one of. Some activities may be so dangerous that the law has to regulate them with extreme consequences. This is exactly what happens under the rule of strict liability. Common law has an aversion to imposing strict liability most likely because of the absence of mens rea in these offences. Before proceeding, let me note that there is no article of which i am aware devoted to the. Oct 05, 2011 we use your linkedin profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. Criminal law classifies strict liability as one of five possible mentes reae mental states that a defendant may have in pursuit of the crime. In this blog post, pramit bhattacharya, student, damodaram sanjivayya national law university, writes about the rule of strict liability and absolute liability. This conclusion was reached as the offence had been created in the interest of public. First, you should keep in mind that whole books have been written. This rule is very important for commercial and other activities that have the potential to result in horrific damages.
Elements of delict act, wrongfulness, fault, causation and damage delict exception of cases of strict liability role of. What is a crime purpose sought to be achieved by imposing criminal liability on persons or. Strict liability and presumptive law differ a great deal. Strict liability or liability without fault does not require someone to prove that there was an intent behind the act. Nearly half of all criminal offences are offences of strict liability. Criminal law and procedure 01 introduction page 4 of 19 a formal rules logical, formal reasoning.
Pdf summary notes on strict liability tort onyekachi duru. The claimant need only prove that the tort occurred and that the defendant was responsible. Strict liability essentials of strict liability youtube. As under strict liability, the defendant may get a chance to run from his liability of causing damage, whereas under absolute liability the defendant is held absolutely liable for his wrong doing. Forms of action, specific remedies from case to case principles of justice equity and good conscienceunmodified character advantages and disadvantages definition, nature, scope and. See duckler, supra note 55, at 200 arguing that modern trends in the law are. A brief history of strict product liability law an injury with no remedy at law it is exceedingly rare, in the law, when one can point to a general rule that is both well established and uniformly followed. Strict liability which crimes are crimes of strict liability. Concept of strict liability and absolute liability ipleaders. A brief history of strict product liability law an injury with no remedy at law it is exceedingly rare, in the law, when one can point to a.
Liability for an offence requires that the defendants outward. May 04, 2017 absolute liability strict liability exceptions the court gave two basic reasons justifying the rule. Rules of strict and absolute liability legal bites law. Criminal law doesnt grant individuals rights state prosecutes, not individualsin tort the individuals affected can actually sue tort v criminal law duty not to hit you. Tort law defines the conditions under which a person is entitled to damage. At common law only two offences are of strict liability, nuisance and criminal libel. Strict liability crimes are those in which the defendant is held liable for a criminal offense he committed, even if mens rea is absent. What is the major difference between a strict liability law.
512 540 867 795 464 1021 926 1215 1140 227 1160 635 1050 752 21 136 1433 830 721 754 968 314 598 649 994 301 1413 1161 375 1079 489 1010 1416 1340 1087